Millenium || The Girl Who Played with Fire

 Learning why the Girl Played with Fire

As usual, I left a fad pass me by. For one reason or another, I refrained from reading the Millennium series back in 2010 and I never rode that wave with the rest of the world. Quick on the uptake, I am now currently expanding my literary pop culture and I have succumbed to Stieg Larsson. Larsson, you sensational writer and taken much too soon, I have a bone to pick with you. The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo took me not 2 weeks to finish, not even a year to finish but almost a YEAR AND A HALF. In that space of time, I did move country and have three jobs but A YEAR. Come on, Stieg. In absolution, however, I finished it, moved home to Ireland and began the second in the Millenium Series. It took me two days. Two. Days.

The Girl Who Played With Fire

What a family.

I am not sure if I speak for all avid readers but the first instalment in the series, yes, used many of the common crime thriller ‘who-done-it’ techniques. Like burdening the reader with insane jargon of a mysterious family that occupy an entire island. (Crikey, that was a mouthful) Reminiscent of an Agatha Christie novel he relayed meticulous descriptions of each and every member which may or may not feature in the novel and left me exhausted yet made me realise I don’t even know my OWN family in such depth. It was at that point I put the book down and started on the rest of my bucket list, however, I wish I hadn’t. I had just put it down on (unbeknownst to me) the most crucial part when Salander joins Blomkvist on his quest for the truth. I must admit, upon returning to it 9 months later, I began to understand why these novels achieve such acclaim. The way Larsson tells a story is like dozing in the morning sun in summery Spain and then suddenly waking to 40 degree heat and all hell breaks loose because you’ve turned into a hot burning mess.

Choo choo!

What I enjoyed about The Girl Who Played with Fire, is that Larsson did not spend time repeating much of the first novel to an unknown reader but rather tied the important facts of each character seamlessly and from the get-go the novel took off on a completely new topic, as gripping and as filled with twists and turns as the search for Harriet Vanger in Millennium |. Rolling like a long-distance 1940’s steam train. This thriller moved steadily along, rushing at moments, but all we have to do is put all trust in Larsson, the driver, to take us to a satisfactory destination.

Phenomenal.

Literally. As Boyd Tonkin  said Lisbeth Salander “is the most original heroine to emerge in crime fiction for many years…” Independent. And he is utterly correct. To be expected Larsson weaves you into a web of characters once again and there were times I got a little lost within all the Swedish names. But, my god he captured me from start to finish. I could finally understand why these books had become a page turner for the masses.

Our Salander The Misfit

Lisbeth is a harrowing heroine that is the driving force behind this series (hence the title) A ruthless young woman with a hidden agenda of her own aspires readers to take the law into their own hands as she does so well. From a stylistic point of view Larsson has created a dominant character that is removed from one third of the book.  He left both the readers and his characters guessing for over 130 pages as to what could possibly be happening with Salander as the last we heard of her she was standing in a soon to be crime scene which amounted in two murders. This is a testament to the strength of his writing and his conjuring of such a powerhouse, yet vulnerable character of Salander. Like Blomkvist, we want to believe Salander is innocent but is murder completely out of character? I found myself returning to the last moment we see Salander, sitting having coffee with Johansson and Svensson to see if there is any clue whatsoever as to why she would be now charged with murder. And that begs the question of Zala. An apparent sub plot from the beginning that shocks us all by the end – the real reason the Girl Played with FIRE. But I am not interested in spoilers, I am more interested in what you think!

Life hacks to take from Lisbeth Salander

  • All rapists should be punished immediately – preferably with a makeshift tattoo gun. I recommend the poetry of “I AM A SADISTIC PIG, A PERVERT AND A RAPIST”. Let’s face it, these beautiful words are sufficient on any part of a violent sex offender’s body but the stomach is ideal as a blank canvas to write as big as you like. Remember, that should the offender repeat themselves then please do not refrain from repeating the poem along their foreheads.
  • Although never used, it is wise to always carry a hammer.
  • If at all possible, develop a photographic memory – this can come in handy in almost all walks of life.
  • When on holidays, like most do, study mathematical theorems that have baffled scientists for decades. (I’m not too sure why, but if this is something you enjoy then, by golly, it can’t be a bad thing!)
  • Befriend a fiery dominatrix woman for sex (because why not) and never ask her inappropriate questions, but do, take from her any cigarette case she may give as a gift. This is not only just a classy way to smoke but it has the power to remove you from all sticky suffocating situations.

 

As a whirlwind of originality, albeit time consuming, as The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo was, The Girl Who Played with Fire obliterated any feelings of contempt towards it. Needless to say, I was enthralled by the second Millennium instalment and I hope you were too. I cannot wait to sink my teeth into the third, and now possibly the FOURTH. However, I don’t know how pushed I am about someone continuing a series after the author’s death (I must look into that – any thoughts?). Please take this post as a tribute to Stieg Larsson, who has become one of the most sensational crime thriller writers of our time, unaffected by fame and money, he has given us raw talent, let his legacy live on for decades to come.

To any of you who is basking in the afterglow of one of Larssons great thrillers, half a decade after the rest of the world like me, Please leave a comment or send me a message with your thoughts, I would LOVE to hear what you think about it! 

I am always on the look out for new books so please, Online Literary World – any suggestions? It took me five years to pick up this trilogy and for the life of me I don’t know why so it’s safe to say I REALLY need your help!

Next up is The Little Coffee Shop of Kabul  by Deborah Rodriguez, stay tuned!

Advertisements

20 thoughts on “Millenium || The Girl Who Played with Fire

  1. Awesome post. I finally read the first book this year, but I haven’t gotten to the others. Soon! I’m curious about the movies, but I haven’t been brave enough to find out if they were done well.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I am still getting the hang of this. Was I meant to approve? I watched the American film of the first one with Daniel Craig. Rooney Mara is sensational. We also have all of the Swedish films that I haven’t watched yet either. so I am pretty much in the same boat as you! Keep me posted! Fantastic trilogy.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I enjoyed your post! I read the first book of the series and was given the second book which I have no interest in opening. I thought the first was too far fetched and long. I just didn’t get what all the hype was about. And I am horrible with foreign names so that was the nail in the coffin. I am currently reading A Moveable Feast by Hemingway, the restored version, and I am enjoying it so much more than I thought I would. Since I just stumbled upon your blog, I am not sure if you read it already. I can’t wait to read more of your posts!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I absolutely agree with you on the first one! As you can see the names were my last nail as well, I put it down for months and I didn’t think that any book with that much critical acclaim should make me do that so I was completely turned off. I hope this post convinced you to pick up that second one and didn’t spoil it too much for you! Trust me, it gets better! The second instalment drives straight into action with some new foreign names, but nowhere near as confusing as the first and you can really immerse yourself in the plot. Highly recommend it! A Moveable Feast? I haven’t read it yet no, but I will sure to! Keep a look out, for when I do I will certainly give you a mention! Thanks for reading!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Well that’s true that it’s the one of the best stories you can ever read. You know Larsson had planned millennium series in ten books but somehow coz o his death we just got trilogy. But its still a great treat for readers. Do read about Larsson’s life journey then you will understand his true inspiration. People loved these series as it had some reality in it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thank you so much for reading what random thoughts I had to say! I’ve only looked into him a small bit before I read them and know he was a journalist in Sweden, so I can see where he gets his inspiration from! I must go back and read up on him some more. Very excited to read the third, do you think the fourth would be any good?

      Like

  4. Such a marvellous in-depth review, and a great review style! I was glad that you realised why you should never give up on the first book! I personally never struggled with the information overload when it comes to the family, but my word, there’s some great scenes!

    It’s probably my favourite book – it’s tied with ‘The Curious Incident…’ by Mark Haddon at the moment!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Oh thank you so much! Stop. Mark Haddon’s Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime is simply beautiful. An in depth slice of wonder. I absolutely devoured that book! You have such great taste! The play of The Curious Incident came to town when I lived in Edinburgh and I was absolutely kicking myself for missing it, its supposed to be entrancing!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Hi! Thanks for stopping by my blog earlier. I really enjoyed this post. To be honest, I’d heard about the trilogy when it came out but never got around to it. A friend strongly recommended the first part to me and I thought I’d pick it up after my next couple of books. Then I saw a host of negative reviews and was in two minds. But your post helped me make the decision – will definitely be reading Part 1 to get to Part 2.

    Also, to add to the post-death-series-continuation discussion – I’ve never been a fan. I don’t think others can associate with the characters an author creates like he can himself. Not entirely the same situation, but I thought the Bourne series was done to death for the same reason (by authors other than Robert Ludlum who continued the series). Never could go beyond the third and now, I doubt I even want to. Why risk tarnishing what I already like, right?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi Rishika, I completely agree! First of all, I’m glad you enjoyed the post and I hope you will pick the trilogy up. I don’t understand this notion of continuing after the author has passed and to me it seems so transparent that it’s publishing houses looking for money which I think would feed into my enjoyment of the book. But you’re right, I don’t think an author can do a character created by someone else the same justice. Thank you for your response, I really enjoy your blog too!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s